Does John know Micah killed Arthur?

Does John Know Micah Killed Arthur?

The question on everyone’s mind after the events of Red Dead Redemption 2 is whether John Marston knew that Micah Bell killed Arthur Morgan. The game’s plot is full of twists and turns, and this one is no exception. Let’s dive into the mystery and explore the clues.

The Game’s Lore

Before we dive into the specifics, it’s essential to understand the lore of Red Dead Redemption 2. The game’s story is heavily focused on the Van der Linde gang, led by Dutch van der Linde. As the game progresses, Arthur Morgan, a high-ranking member of the gang, begins to question Dutch’s leadership and morality. Ultimately, this leads to Arthur’s betrayal and eventual demise at the hands of Micah Bell.

Does John Know?

According to the game’s events, John Marston finds Arthur’s body after the betrayal. However, we don’t see John’s direct reaction or any explicit conversation about what happened to Arthur. Does John know that Micah killed Arthur? The game doesn’t provide a definitive answer, leaving players to speculate.

Clue 1: The Investigation

After Arthur’s death, John and the other gang members begin to suspect that Micah was responsible. They conduct an investigation, gathering clues and following leads. This investigation culminates in a heated confrontation between John and Micah, where Micah denies any involvement in Arthur’s death.

Clue 2: Charles’ Testimony

One of the gang members, Charles Smith, provides important testimony about the events leading up to Arthur’s death. Charles reveals that he saw Micah arguing with Arthur earlier that day and that Micah seemed very agitated. This statement suggests that Micah was indeed involved in Arthur’s death, but it doesn’t explicitly confirm his culpability.

Clue 3: John’s Inference

After the confrontation with Micah, John begins to piece together the events. He infers that Micah was likely responsible, but he doesn’t seem to have concrete evidence or confirmation. This inference is based on John’s personal experience and his understanding of Micah’s character.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while John Marston doesn’t receive explicit confirmation that Micah killed Arthur, the evidence suggests that he likely believes Micah was involved. The investigation, Charles’ testimony, and John’s inference all point to Micah’s guilt. Despite this, the game never explicitly states John’s awareness of Micah’s responsibility, leaving the player’s imagination to fill in the gaps.

Table of Clues

Bulleted List of Points

• The game’s story is full of twists and turns, making it challenging to determine John’s level of awareness about Micah’s involvement in Arthur’s death.
• The investigation and Charles’ testimony both suggest that Micah was involved in Arthur’s death, but they don’t provide concrete evidence.
• John’s inference is based on his personal experience and understanding of Micah’s character, but it doesn’t receive explicit confirmation.

Final Thoughts

In the end, the truth about Micah’s role in Arthur’s death is left to the player’s interpretation. While John’s inference suggests that he likely believes Micah was responsible, the game never provides a definitive answer. As players, we’re left to piece together the evidence and draw our own conclusions.