How come Arthur didn’t spread TB?

The iconic character of Arthur Morgan! His story is deeply seated in the world of Dutch van der Linde in Red Dead Redemption 2 and their eventual downturn together marked by Arthur’s tuberculosis contagion. But, How come Arthur didn’t manage to spread TB to its gang members? In short, the answer lies complexly intertwined with the history of Arthur’s character: his interactions with others post-infection, the societal norms of the time against TB, and the various factors affecting the spread (or non-spread herein) of the disease under the given circumstances.

• Initial Infection Stage’s Timing Plays Essential. There was a specific scene on the early stages of development, which shows Arthur meeting Thomas Downes, that is the origin of everything is really a big stretch by the imagination that Arthur actually did not pass his symptoms onto other people in significant proximity.

The way Arthur’s story unfolds underlines his vulnerability, given his illness, which affects his social interactions and dynamics within the gang.

TB’s Controvertial History in Medical and Social Context

Around the late 19, TB, also knowns

=====

How Didn’t Arthur Spread TB?- Unraveling the Reason

Arthur Morgan, along with Dutch van der van der Linde, makes up the core of Robert Rockstar’s Red Dread Redemption 2. Not only does their story impact the game’s narrative line, but it also becomes significantly intertwined with the world to come, particularly with issues like tuberculosis (TB).

<h2(Direction) to the Question on Arthur’s TB

With the passage of time proving Arthur’s fate, why didn’t he spread more of TB to his confidants? This story’s depth lies in interconnectedness of Arthur’s interpersonal interactions after his infection becomes known, societal norms linked to TB during that, and various factors influencing
the spread (or more specifically, non-sweep) of the disease due certain conditions.