Is Dung Eater the worst ending?

Is Dung Eater the Worst Ending?

The world of Elden Ring is filled with numerous endings, each with its own unique story and implications. Among these endings, one stands out as particularly despicable: the Dung Eater’s ending. But is it indeed the worst ending in the game? In this article, we’ll explore the significance of the Dung Eater’s ending and weigh its moral implications against those of other endings.

What is the Dung Eater’s Ending?

To understand the Dung Eater’s ending, it’s essential to know the character and their role in the game. The Dung Eater is a unique NPC in Elden Ring who serves as a catalyst for the game’s storyline. To achieve this ending, players must use the Mending Rune of the Fell Curse on Fractured Marika, the demigod who has cursed the Lands Between. This action has catastrophic consequences, causing the world to be forever changed.

Why is the Dung Eater’s Ending Considered the Worst?

So, why is the Dung Eater’s ending considered the worst? The primary reason is that it curses the world, essentially condemning the inhabitants of the Lands Between to a fate worse than death. By using the Mending Rune, players are essentially dooming the world to an eternity of darkness and suffering. This ending is often referred to as the "worst" because of the moral implications it has on the game’s story and characters.

Comparison to Other Endings

To fully understand the significance of the Dung Eater’s ending, it’s essential to compare it to other endings in the game. Here’s a brief overview of some of the other endings:

  • Lord of Frenzied Flame: This ending sees the Tarnished embracing the Three Fingers and essentially destroying the Lands Between and its inhabitants.
  • Age of Stars: This ending leaves the Erdtree intact but creates a dark ash-like substance that permeates the area near the capital city.
  • Goldmask: In this ending, Goldmask’s studies reveal the truth about the Golden Order, leading to a new understanding of the world.

While each of these endings has its own unique implications, none are as morally reprehensible as the Dung Eater’s ending. The Lord of Frenzied Flame ending, for example, is often considered worse than the Dung Eater’s ending because it directly destroys the world and its inhabitants. However, the Dung Eater’s ending is particularly heinous because it curses the world, essentially condemning its inhabitants to a fate worse than death.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Dung Eater’s ending is indeed one of the worst endings in Elden Ring. Its moral implications are significant, as it curses the world and condemns its inhabitants to a fate worse than death. While other endings may have their own unique implications, the Dung Eater’s ending stands out as particularly despicable. Whether you choose to achieve this ending or not, it’s essential to understand its significance in the context of the game’s story and characters.

Table: Endings in Elden Ring

Ending Description Moral Implications
Dung Eater Curses the world, condemning its inhabitants to a fate worse than death High
Lord of Frenzied Flame Destroys the Lands Between and its inhabitants High
Age of Stars Creates a dark ash-like substance, affecting the area near the capital city Medium
Goldmask Reveals the truth about the Golden Order, leading to a new understanding of the world Low

Note: The moral implications listed in the table are subjective and may vary depending on individual perspectives.

Your friends have asked us these questions - Check out the answers!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top