Should Bell Tell the Truth in Call of Duty: Cold War?
In Call of Duty: Cold War, one of the major turning points comes with Adler asking about Perseus’ whereabouts. This decision has lasting consequences, affecting the player’s journey and the end outcome of the game. When faced with this choice, players are left wondering should Bell tell the truth or lie? The answer to this question involves understanding the implications of your decision and the consequences you will face.
Dangers of Lying:
If Bell decides to lie to Adler, this will lead to a shift in the storyline, specifically in the final mission location. The mission will then change to "Ashes to Ashes," revealing a new and darker version of the story. According to the game’s writers, this ending is not ideal, as it sets in motion a chain of catastrophic events.
Consequences of Lying:
The aftermath of lying results in the following:
- Global Chaos and Anarchy: The cordis die supporters, instructed by Menendez, attack the White House, destroying it and causing widespread confusion and panic.
- Adler’s Defeat: Adler, frustrated and enraged by Bell’s lying, will ultimately be eliminated, but not before imparting a crucial message or task to the player to complete.
- Unstable World and Unpredictable Future: The world is cast into chaos, and the chances of a stable future reduce significantly.
Benefits of Telling the Truth:
On the other hand, if Bell decides to tell the truth to Adler, the game undergoes a different transformation in the final mission location.
Consequences of Truth:
The aftermath of the player making the correct choice results in the following:
- Europe’s Safety Saved: By revealing Perseus’ location, Europe is saved from Nuclear War, and the catastrophe is averted.
- Adler Dies: Adler, determined, will ultimately sacrifice himself on the mission, ensuring global security.
- A More Stable World, with a Predictable Future: The world is relatively stable, and the consequences of the player’s earlier actions are mitigated.