What Happens if Arthur Chooses to Go Back for the Money?
In the critically acclaimed video game Red Dead Redemption 2, players are presented with a difficult decision: whether to help John Marston or go back for the money. In this article, we’ll delve into the consequences of choosing to go back for the money, exploring the outcome of this choice and its impact on the game’s story.
The Consequences of Going Back for the Money
If Arthur chooses to go back for the money, he heads back to the burning camp of the Van der Linde gang, where he retrieves the loot. However, this decision comes with a significant cost. Micah Bell ambushes Arthur, and the two engage in a brutal knife fight. The outcome of this fight depends on Arthur’s honor level, with a higher honor level granting Arthur the upper hand in the fight.
The Fight with Micah Bell
The fight with Micah Bell is a pivotal moment in the game, and its outcome has significant consequences for the story. If Arthur has a high honor level, he is able to take out one of Micah’s eyes, dealing significant damage to the traitorous gang member. However, if Arthur’s honor level is low, Micah gains the upper hand, and Arthur is left severely injured.
The Aftermath of the Fight
Regardless of the outcome of the fight, Arthur’s decision to go back for the money has severe consequences. Dutch Van der Linde, the leader of the gang, is killed by Micah Bell, who had been secretly working with the Pinkertons all along. This betrayal sets off a chain of events that ultimately leads to the downfall of the Van der Linde gang.
The Impact on the Game’s Story
The decision to go back for the money has a significant impact on the game’s story, leading to a variety of different outcomes depending on the player’s choices. The fate of the Van der Linde gang is sealed, and the game’s narrative takes a darker turn. The consequences of this decision are felt throughout the game, with the player’s choices influencing the fate of the characters and the outcome of the story.
Comparison to the Alternative Choice
In contrast, choosing to help John Marston leads to a more positive outcome, with the Van der Linde gang being able to escape and continue their lives. This choice also leads to a more hopeful ending, with the player’s characters living on and finding a way to redeem themselves.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the decision to go back for the money in Red Dead Redemption 2 is a difficult one, with significant consequences for the game’s story and characters. The choice is not an easy one, and players must weigh the benefits of retrieving the loot against the potential costs to the gang and its members. Ultimately, the decision to go back for the money is a reflection of Arthur’s character and his commitment to the gang and its values.
Table: Consequences of Going Back for the Money
| Consequence | Description |
|---|---|
| Micah Bell ambushes Arthur | Arthur is attacked by Micah Bell, leading to a knife fight |
| Dutch Van der Linde is killed | Dutch is killed by Micah Bell, setting off a chain of events that leads to the downfall of the gang |
| The fate of the Van der Linde gang is sealed | The gang is unable to escape and continues to decline |
| The game’s narrative takes a darker turn | The game’s story becomes more serious and somber |
Bullets: Key Takeaways
• The decision to go back for the money has significant consequences for the game’s story and characters
• Micah Bell ambushes Arthur and the two engage in a knife fight
• The outcome of the fight depends on Arthur’s honor level
• Dutch Van der Linde is killed by Micah Bell, leading to the downfall of the gang
• The game’s narrative takes a darker turn, reflecting the consequences of Arthur’s choice