Which ending is better Witcher 3 Hearts of Stone?

Which Ending is Better in Witcher 3: Hearts of Stone?

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is an action role-playing game developed by CD Projekt RED, and its expansion pack, Hearts of Stone, is a thrilling adventure that continues the story of Geralt of Rivia. With two distinct endings to choose from, players are left wondering which one is better. In this article, we’ll delve into the two endings and explore the pros and cons of each, helping you make an informed decision.

Ending 1: Saving Olgierd

In the first ending, Geralt must save Olgierd, a sorcerer who has been cursed by O’Dimm. To achieve this, players must complete a timed challenge that involves solving a riddle set by O’Dimm. If the riddle is solved correctly, O’Dimm’s curse is broken, and Olgierd is saved.

Pros:

• Morally upright: Saving Olgierd is considered the "good" ending, as it shows Geralt’s compassion and willingness to help those in need.
• Interesting storyline: The story of Olgierd and O’Dimm adds a new layer of depth to the game’s narrative, exploring themes of morality and the consequences of one’s actions.

Cons:

• Time-consuming: The timed challenge can be frustrating and time-consuming, especially for players who are not familiar with the game’s mechanics.
• Limited impact: Some players may feel that the impact of saving Olgierd is limited, as it does not have a significant effect on the overall story or gameplay.

Ending 2: Letting Olgierd Die

In the second ending, Geralt allows Olgierd to die, breaking the curse and freeing him from his suffering.

Pros:

• More practical: Letting Olgierd die can be seen as a more practical choice, as it eliminates the need for the timed challenge and allows players to move on with the story.
• Less frustrating: This ending can be less frustrating for players who struggle with the timed challenge, as it eliminates the need for additional effort.

Cons:

• Less morally upright: Allowing Olgierd to die can be seen as a less morally upright choice, as it shows a lack of compassion and willingness to help those in need.
• Limited story impact: Some players may feel that the impact of letting Olgierd die is limited, as it does not have a significant effect on the overall story or gameplay.

Ultimately, the Choice is Yours

Both endings have their pros and cons, and the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference. If you value morality and compassion, saving Olgierd may be the better choice. However, if you prefer a more practical and less frustrating approach, letting Olgierd die may be the way to go.

Table: Comparison of Endings

Conclusion

In conclusion, the two endings in Witcher 3: Hearts of Stone offer players a choice between morality and practicality. While saving Olgierd is considered the "good" ending, it comes with the challenge of a timed puzzle. Letting Olgierd die, on the other hand, is a more practical choice, but it may be seen as less morally upright. Ultimately, the choice is yours, and it’s up to you to decide which ending is better.