Who is better to cure: Mia or Zoe?
In Resident Evil 7: Biohazard, players face a crucial decision that ultimately determines the fate of Mia and Zoe. The storyline revolves around these two girls, who have been the subject of sinister experiments performed by the Umbrella Corporation. The primary question on fans’ minds is, Who is better to cure: Mia or Zoe?
About Mia and Zoe
Both Mia and Zoe are part of the Umbrella Corporation’s twisted experiments. Mia has been infected with the EVE virus, making her grow into a gigantic, twisted creature. Meanwhile, Zoe is a mutated, tentacled child who represents the ultimate example of Eveline’s evolution. Without a cure, both will eventually succumb to the virus, furthering its spread.
Curing Mia
In the canonic ending, Ethan Watts, the main protagonist, opts to cure Mia. Despite the risks and challenges ahead, Ethan makes the life-or-death decision to inoculate Mia. This option allows her to escape with Ethan, as they navigate the treacherous, infected world together.
Advantages of curing Mia:
• She is humanoid: Mia still retains a human-like form, reducing the chances of encountering severe difficulties during transportation.
• Less agitated and violent: Untreated zombies tend to exhibit more destructive behavior. A cured Mia will be calmer, allowing for safer passage to safety.
• Future prospects: After curing, Mia has a chance of returning to normal, provided she receives medical attention.
• Romantic options: Ethan can potentially begin a romantic relationship with her, adding depth to his character.
Disadvantages:
• Huge obstacles: The plantation is surrounded by infected individuals, significantly increasing the risks to those with Mia inside.
• Evan’s vulnerability: With Eveline’s awakening, danger lurks near, affecting the safety of both.
• Fate: unknown: Unbeknownst to us, she might still transform into one of the zombie-like inhabitants, even if cured momentarily.
Curing Zoe
In this scenario, Ethan chooses not to medicate Zoe. This raises concerns about Zoe’s vulnerability to the surroundings and whether she can ultimately be protected.
Advantages:
• Reduced emotional attachment: With Zoe infected, empathy is diminished, allowing less emotional attachment between her and the game world.
• Tactical gains: Fewer moral choices are rendered, simplifying the battle ahead.
• Greater control: Control over a less erratic or violent situation might lead to more defined actions.
Disadvantages:
• Increased hazards: Zoe is more easily swayed and can inflict harm on nearby characters (Ethan), making progression more complicated.
• Vulnerability: At this stage, Zoe appears to be fully infected by the virus.
• Future prospects uncertain: Cure or no cure, fate is uncertain.
Making the Right Decision
A comparison of curing Mia against Zoe highlights several key challenges and advantages.
| Curing Mia | Curing Zoe | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantages | Safety, Humanitarian, future prospects, romantic interests | Reduced Emotional Attachment, Tactical Gains, Simplified Progress | |
| Disadvantages | Huge obstacles, Evasion’s | Increased Hazards, Vulnerability, Uncertainty |
Which choice is right? With no definitive, universally favored answer, consider the primary concerns:
• Preservation of Human Life and Relationships: By curing Mia, you aim to uphold human connections, potentially initiating a romantic plotline between Ethan and her.
• Strategic Considerations: If minimizing emotional complications and maintaining tactical control reign supreme, omitting Mae’s cure will lead the story in this direction.
• Vulnerabilities and Risks: Realize that omitting Ma’s cure opens the window for increased violence and unexpected dangers.
To answer "Who is better to cure: Mia or Zoe?," weigh these factors attentively. Does the outcome align with the story progression and character intentions?
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision relies on various factors, highlighting the unique experiences in the Resident Evil 7 story. Depending on the importance of empathy, control, and connections, choose a path by weighing the trade-offs at hand. No matter what, the chosen path may not be simple but will create a lasting narrative impact.