Who Should I Shoot: Harper or Menendez?
In the Call of Duty: Black Ops II game, players are faced with a difficult decision: should they shoot Harper or Menendez? Both characters are crucial to the game’s storyline, and the choice has significant consequences. In this article, we’ll delve into the pros and cons of each option and provide a detailed analysis to help you make an informed decision.
Harper vs. Menendez: A Brief Background
Before we dive into the analysis, let’s briefly introduce the two characters. Harper is a loyal ally to the player, while Menendez is the main antagonist of the game. Menendez is a ruthless and cunning individual who will stop at nothing to achieve his goals. Harper, on the other hand, is a trusted friend and a key player in the game’s storyline.
Consequences of Choosing Harper
Pros:
- Preservation of Alliance: By choosing to spare Harper, you preserve the alliance between him and the player. This can lead to additional storyline opportunities and new missions.
- Improved Relationship: Harper’s gratitude for being spared can strengthen your relationship with him, leading to better communication and cooperation in future missions.
- Additional Intel: Harper’s expertise and knowledge can provide valuable intel to the player, helping to progress the storyline and overcome challenges.
Cons:
- Compromise on Principles: By choosing to spare Harper, you may compromise on your principles and morals. Harper is involved in questionable activities, and by sparing him, you may be enabling his questionable behavior.
- Limited Storyline Progression: Sparing Harper may limit the storyline’s progression, as the game’s narrative is heavily dependent on the player’s choices.
Consequences of Choosing Menendez
Pros:
- Removal of Antagonist: By choosing to kill Menendez, you remove the game’s main antagonist, potentially simplifying the storyline and reducing the player’s moral dilemma.
- No Compromise on Principles: Choosing to kill Menendez allows you to maintain your principles and morals, as he is a ruthless and morally corrupt individual.
Cons:
- Loss of Alliance: Menendez’s death can sever the alliance between him and the player, potentially leading to additional challenges and conflicts.
- Unfinished Business: Menendez’s death may leave unresolved storylines and conflicts, potentially leading to an unsatisfying conclusion to the game.
Key Considerations
- Moral Dilemma: Both options present a moral dilemma, requiring the player to weigh the consequences of their actions.
- Storyline Impact: The choice has significant implications for the game’s storyline, potentially affecting the player’s relationships and future missions.
- Gameplay Mechanics: The choice may impact gameplay mechanics, such as the availability of certain skills or weapons.
Conclusion
Choosing between Harper and Menendez is a difficult decision, and there is no clear-cut answer. Both options have significant consequences, and the player must weigh the pros and cons before making a decision. Ultimately, the choice is a personal one, and the player must consider their own values and morals before making a decision.
Additional Resources
- Call of Duty: Black Ops II Wiki
- IGN: Call of Duty: Black Ops II Review
- GameFAQs: Call of Duty: Black Ops II FAQ
Additional Tips
- Pay Attention to Storyline: Pay attention to the storyline and character developments to inform your decision.
- Weigh the Consequences: Weigh the consequences of your actions, considering the impact on the game’s narrative and your relationships with characters.
- Experiment and Replay: Experiment with different choices and replay the game to see how the storyline unfolds with different decisions.