Why does Bartleby not get fired?

Why Does Bartleby Not Get Fired?

In Herman Melville’s short story "Bartleby, the Scrivener," the titular character’s enigmatic behavior raises questions about his employment and the motivations of his employer, the narrator. One of the most pressing questions is why Bartleby, who consistently refuses to perform his duties as a scrivener, is not fired. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind Bartleby’s continued employment and the significance of his inaction.

The Narrator’s Compassion

The narrator, who is also Bartleby’s employer, is a kind and compassionate individual. He is deeply troubled by Bartleby’s behavior and is saddened by his employee’s decline. The narrator’s compassion for Bartleby is evident in his decision not to fire him, despite Bartleby’s refusal to work. The narrator’s motivation is not purely financial; he is driven by a desire to understand and help Bartleby, who has become a mysterious and isolated figure.

The Difficulty of Firing

Firing an employee is never an easy task, and in Bartleby’s case, it is particularly challenging. The narrator is aware that firing Bartleby would be a humane act, as Bartleby is no longer able to perform his duties. However, the narrator is also aware that firing an employee is a serious decision that can have long-term consequences. The narrator is torn between his desire to help Bartleby and his responsibility as an employer to ensure the success of his business.

Bartleby’s Isolation

Bartleby’s isolation is a significant factor in his continued employment. The narrator is concerned about Bartleby’s well-being and is afraid of what might happen to him if he is fired. The narrator believes that Bartleby is already isolated and that firing him would only worsen his situation. By keeping Bartleby employed, the narrator is able to keep an eye on him and ensure that he is safe.

The Power of Sympathy

Sympathy plays a significant role in the narrator’s decision not to fire Bartleby. The narrator is moved by Bartleby’s situation and is sympathetic to his plight. The narrator believes that Bartleby is suffering and that firing him would only exacerbate his suffering. By showing compassion and understanding, the narrator is able to connect with Bartleby and keep him employed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Bartleby’s continued employment is a result of the narrator’s compassion, the difficulty of firing, Bartleby’s isolation, and the power of sympathy. The narrator’s decision not to fire Bartleby is a human one, driven by a desire to understand and help his employee. By keeping Bartleby employed, the narrator is able to keep an eye on him and ensure that he is safe. Ultimately, the story of Bartleby, the Scrivener, is a powerful exploration of the human condition and the importance of compassion and understanding.

Table: Reasons for Bartleby’s Continued Employment

Bullets: Significance of Bartleby’s Inaction

• Challenges the reader’s expectations: Bartleby’s inaction challenges the reader’s expectations of what should happen in a story.
• Raises questions about employment: Bartleby’s inaction raises questions about the nature of employment and the responsibilities of employers.
• Highlights the importance of compassion: Bartleby’s inaction highlights the importance of compassion and understanding in human relationships.
• Explores the human condition: Bartleby’s inaction is a powerful exploration of the human condition and the complexities of human relationships.