Why Dragon Skin was banned?

Why Dragon Skin was Banned?

Dragon Skin, a popular body armor product, was banned by the US Army in 2007. The decision was made due to concerns about the product’s effectiveness and safety. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind the ban and the implications it had on the body armor industry.

Inadequate Testing

One of the main reasons for the ban was the lack of thorough testing of Dragon Skin. The product was designed to stop high-velocity rifle rounds, but it was not tested against the Army’s standards. The Army requires body armor to be tested against a range of threats, including handgun and rifle rounds, and Dragon Skin failed to meet these standards.

Concerns about Safety

The Army was also concerned about the safety of soldiers who wore Dragon Skin. The product was designed to be worn as a standalone body armor, but it was not tested in combination with other types of body armor. This raised concerns that soldiers who wore Dragon Skin may not have been adequately protected against certain types of threats.

Ineffective Against Armor-Piercing Rounds

Dragon Skin was also found to be ineffective against armor-piercing rounds. These types of rounds are designed to penetrate body armor, and Dragon Skin was not able to stop them. This was a major concern for the Army, as armor-piercing rounds are commonly used in combat.

Comparison with Other Body Armor

Here is a comparison of Dragon Skin with other body armor products:

Implications of the Ban

The ban on Dragon Skin had significant implications for the body armor industry. It highlighted the importance of thorough testing and certification of body armor products. It also led to increased scrutiny of body armor products and manufacturers, with a focus on ensuring that products meet the necessary standards.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Dragon Skin was banned by the US Army due to concerns about its effectiveness and safety. The product was not tested against the Army’s standards, and it was found to be ineffective against armor-piercing rounds. The ban highlighted the importance of thorough testing and certification of body armor products, and it led to increased scrutiny of the industry.