Why is Arthur Morgan Never Mentioned in RDR1?
Arthur Morgan, the main protagonist of Red Dead Redemption 2, is never mentioned in the original Red Dead Redemption (RDR1). This is because RDR1 is set several years before the events of RDR2, and Arthur Morgan does not exist at that time. But what else is there to it? Let’s dive into the reasons behind Arthur’s absence in RDR1.
Reasons Arthur Morgan is Not in RDR1
Lack of Character Existence
Bold. Arthur Morgan was created in the timeline of the story. He is not mentioned in RDR1 because he was not yet a character. His introduction as a member of the Van der Linde gang only occurs in the sequel.
Historical Significance
The original Red Dead Redemption is set in the late 1800s, a time of immense change and violence in the American West. Arthur Morgan, as a member of the Van der Linde gang, is part of the declining days of the Wild West. Since his character does not exist until later in the timeline, he cannot be included in RDR1.
Game Story Continuity
RDR1 takes place before the events of RDR2. Arthur’s character would disrupt the story and gameplay of RDR1. Including him in the game would alter the narrative and compromise the storytelling.
Story Consequences
Arthur Morgan’s involvement in RDR1 would lead to changes in the story. It would imply that the Van der Linde gang is more organized and has more power, which is not the case in RDR2. Additionally, his inclusion would mean that his relationship with John Marston and his eventual death would have less significance.
Comparison between RDR1 and RDR2
Comparison Table: RDR1 and RDR2
| Aspect | RDR1 | RDR2 |
|---|---|---|
| Time Period | Late 1800s | Early 1899 |
| Setting | Various locations | West of the United States |
| Main Character | John Marston | Arthur Morgan |
| Storyline | Force John Marston to hunt down his former gang | Follow Arthur Morgan as a member of the Van der Linde gang |
In conclusion, Arthur Morgan’s absence in RDR1 is due to the time period, his lack of existence, the potential for disrupting the story and game continuity, and the significance of his character. Including him in RDR1 would alter the narrative and compromise the storytelling, ultimately changing the essence of the game.
Possible Fate of Arthur Morgan After RDR2
As Red Dead Redemption 3 (RDR3) might take place after RDR2, the story would continue with a possible character like Jack Marston. The timeline and fate of Arthur Morgan would likely remain uncertain, as it was left ambiguous at the end of RDR2.
Speculations
While we don’t know Arthur’s exact fate, here are some speculations based on the story and its ending:
- Arthur leaves the ranch to join or form a new gang or family.
- He chooses to settle down, marrying and starting a new family.
- Arthur leaves to pursue his intentions of living and raising a family in Canada.
- The possible fates mentioned above will be explored in a future game or story, shedding more light on the beloved character.
As the world waits for more information on the potential sequel or continuation, the enigma of Arthur Morgan’s fate continues to intrigue fans and create an air of anticipation around the Red Dead franchise.
Let’s summarize:
• Arthur Morgan’s existence does not coincide with RDR1.
• In RDR1, Arthur would disrupt the story and game continuity.
• Including him would change the narrative and compromise storytelling.
• His fate will likely remain uncertain or will be explored in future media.
These reasons are clear: Arthur Morgan’s absence in RDR1 is essential to maintain the integrity of the game and its story.
- How do I know if I have a USB 2 or 3 port?
- Can you only catch one Charizard Violet?
- Is Earth worth exploring in Starfield?
- Should kids be able to play violent video games?
- Is the Witcher 3 better with enemy upscaling?
- Can huge power be skill swapped?
- What level does Clan Capital unlock?
- What DLC is Nuketown?