Why is Doom Eternal worse than 2016?

Why is Doom Eternal worse than 2016?

Doom Eternal, the latest installment in the iconic Doom franchise, has been met with mixed reviews from fans and critics alike. While it has its moments of brilliance, many argue that it falls short of its predecessor, Doom 2016. In this article, we’ll delve into the reasons why Doom Eternal is considered worse than 2016.

Linear Level Design

One of the most significant issues with Doom Eternal is its linear level design. Unlike Doom 2016, which offered a more open-world experience, Doom Eternal’s levels are more linear and restrictive. This can make the game feel more like a corridor shooter than an exploration-based FPS. The lack of freedom to explore and discover hidden secrets can be frustrating, especially for fans of the franchise.

Not Enough Ammo or Chainsaw Fuel

Another issue that plagues Doom Eternal is the limited amount of ammo and chainsaw fuel. In Doom 2016, players had access to a seemingly endless supply of ammo and chainsaw fuel. In Doom Eternal, however, players are forced to scavenge for resources, which can lead to frustrating moments when you’re low on ammo or fuel. This mechanic can make the game feel more like a survival horror experience than a fast-paced FPS.

Slower Movement Speed

Doom Eternal’s movement speed has also been criticized for being slower than its predecessor. In Doom 2016, players could run at a fast pace and dodge attacks with ease. In Doom Eternal, the movement speed is slower, making it more difficult to dodge attacks and navigate through levels. This can be particularly frustrating in combat situations where quick reflexes are crucial.

Spongy Enemies

The enemies in Doom Eternal have also been criticized for being too durable. In Doom 2016, enemies could be taken down with a few well-placed shots. In Doom Eternal, however, enemies require more shots to take down, making combat feel more laborious. This can lead to frustrating moments where you’re stuck fighting the same enemy for an extended period.

Super Shotgun’s Poor Damage and Reload Speed

The Super Shotgun, a fan favorite from Doom 2016, has been criticized for its poor damage output and slow reload speed in Doom Eternal. In Doom 2016, the Super Shotgun was a powerful and versatile weapon. In Doom Eternal, it feels underpowered and slow to reload, making it less effective in combat situations.

Combat Encounters Feel More Like Puzzles

Doom Eternal’s combat encounters have also been criticized for feeling more like puzzles than intense action sequences. In Doom 2016, combat encounters were fast-paced and chaotic, requiring quick reflexes and strategic thinking. In Doom Eternal, combat encounters often involve solving environmental puzzles to progress, which can feel more like a hindrance than a challenge.

Atmosphere and Sound Design

While Doom Eternal’s atmosphere and sound design are still impressive, they don’t quite live up to the standards set by Doom 2016. The 2016 game’s atmosphere was more intense and unsettling, with a greater emphasis on creating a sense of dread. Doom Eternal’s atmosphere, while still creepy, feels more focused on creating a sense of spectacle rather than tension.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Doom Eternal is considered worse than Doom 2016 due to its linear level design, limited resources, slower movement speed, spongy enemies, poor Super Shotgun performance, combat encounters that feel like puzzles, and atmosphere and sound design that don’t quite live up to the standards set by its predecessor. While Doom Eternal still has its moments of brilliance, it falls short of its predecessor in many areas.