Why was Arthur never mentioned in Red Dead 1?
Red Dead Redemption 1, released in 2010, tells the story of John Marston, a former outlaw forced by the government to hunt down his old gang members. The game takes place in 1911, and the story revolves around John’s journey to redeem himself and protect his family. However, there is a significant character missing from the narrative – Arthur Morgan, the protagonist of Red Dead Redemption 2. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind Arthur’s absence in Red Dead 1.
Arthur’s Non-Existent Past
Arthur Morgan, the central character of Red Dead Redemption 2, was not born during the time period of Red Dead 1. He was born in 1863, while Red Dead 1 takes place in 1911. This means that Arthur would have been around 48 years old during the events of Red Dead 1, which is unlikely to be the case. The game’s storyline is focused on John Marston’s journey, and Arthur’s character is not relevant to the narrative.
No Connection to the Story
Arthur Morgan’s character is not connected to the story of Red Dead 1. He is a member of the Van der Linde gang, which is not present in Red Dead 1. The game’s story is centered around John Marston’s past and his connection to the gang, which does not involve Arthur.
No Mention of the Van der Linde Gang
The Van der Linde gang, which is a central part of Red Dead Redemption 2, is not mentioned in Red Dead 1. The game’s storyline does not touch on the events that occurred before 1911, which would have included the Van der Linde gang’s activities.
No Reason to Include Arthur
There is no reason to include Arthur Morgan in Red Dead 1. The game’s story is focused on John Marston’s journey, and Arthur’s character does not add any significant value to the narrative.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Arthur Morgan was not mentioned in Red Dead 1 because his character is not relevant to the game’s storyline. He was born in 1863, making him too old to be a part of the game’s narrative. The game’s focus is on John Marston’s journey, and Arthur’s character does not add any significant value to the story. The Van der Linde gang, which is central to Arthur’s character, is not mentioned in Red Dead 1.
Table: Red Dead Redemption 1 vs. Red Dead Redemption 2
| Red Dead Redemption 1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Protagonist | John Marston | Arthur Morgan |
| Time Period | 1911 | 1899-1907 |
| Gang | None | Van der Linde gang |
| Connection to Story | John Marston’s past | Arthur Morgan’s journey |
By understanding the reasons behind Arthur’s absence in Red Dead 1, we can appreciate the game’s narrative and the characters that are present in the story. Red Dead Redemption 1 and Red Dead Redemption 2 are two separate games with distinct storylines, and Arthur’s character is not relevant to the first game’s narrative.