Would Hosea Side with Arthur?
In the world of Red Dead Redemption 2, Hosea Matthews, a key character in the Van der Linde gang, is often associated with Dutch van der Linde, the gang’s leader. However, as the story unfolds, it becomes clear that Hosea’s loyalty is not solely bound to Dutch. In fact, Hosea’s actions and words suggest that he might have sided with Arthur Morgan, the game’s protagonist, if he were still alive.
Why Hosea Would Side with Arthur
There are several reasons why Hosea might have sided with Arthur:
• Loyalty to the gang: Despite his loyalty to Dutch, Hosea’s primary concern was the well-being of the gang. As Arthur and Hosea grew closer, Hosea might have seen Arthur as a potential leader who could bring stability and prosperity to the gang.
• Disillusionment with Dutch: Hosea’s relationship with Dutch was complex, and it’s clear that he grew disillusioned with Dutch’s actions and decisions. He might have seen Arthur as a more level-headed and compassionate leader, someone who would prioritize the gang’s well-being over personal interests.
• Respect for Arthur’s character: Hosea admired Arthur’s bravery, loyalty, and compassion. He might have seen Arthur as a role model, someone who embodied the values that the gang once held dear.
The Evidence
Several moments in the game suggest that Hosea might have sided with Arthur:
• Hosea’s conversation with Arthur: In one conversation, Hosea expresses his admiration for Arthur and his leadership skills. He tells Arthur that he believes in him and that he’s the only one who can bring the gang together.
• Hosea’s actions during the gang’s final heist: Hosea’s behavior during the gang’s final heist, where he tries to reason with Dutch and prevent the bloodshed, suggests that he might have been more aligned with Arthur’s values.
• Hosea’s loyalty to the gang: Despite his loyalty to Dutch, Hosea’s primary concern was the well-being of the gang. He might have seen Arthur as a potential leader who could bring stability and prosperity to the gang.
The Implications
If Hosea had sided with Arthur, it would have significant implications for the story:
• Alternative ending: The game’s ending might have been different, with Hosea playing a key role in Arthur’s plans to reform the gang and escape the law.
• Different character dynamics: The relationships between the characters might have been different, with Hosea serving as a mediator between Arthur and the rest of the gang.
• New possibilities for the gang’s future: With Hosea on board, the gang might have had a chance to start anew, leaving their past mistakes behind and forging a brighter future.
Conclusion
While we can only speculate about Hosea’s loyalties, the evidence suggests that he might have sided with Arthur Morgan. Hosea’s admiration for Arthur, his disillusionment with Dutch, and his loyalty to the gang all point to a potential alliance with Arthur. If Hosea had indeed sided with Arthur, it would have had significant implications for the story, offering a different ending and a new direction for the gang’s future.