Would the enclave like the institute?

Would the Enclave like the Institute?

In the Fallout universe, two significant factions stand out – the Enclave and the Institute. While both aim to reshape the world according to their vision, they possess fundamentally different ideologies. Understanding the core goals and philosophies of these factions will enable us to answer the question: would the Enclave like the Institute?

Enclave’s Vision

Martial Governance: The Enclave strives to recreate the pre-war United States, maintaining military control over the regions and rebuilding society under the principle of authoritarian governance.

Technological Advancements: The Enclave emphasizes technology, especially its connection to power armor and advanced weapon development, as a key driver of their vision.

Mutant Eradication: Eliminating or exploiting mutants and other undesired populations is a vital part of their plan, mirroring the pre-war’s fear and hatred of nuclear fallout survivors.

No Room for Mutated Dwellers: According to the Enclave’s ethos, society should only include "pure" descendants of the original colonizers or restored to a pre-war, pre-Fallout level. They view any deviance as a threat, whether human or genetically engineered.

Institute’s Vision

Genetic Engineering and Utopian Society: The Institute’s primary focus lies in advanced genetic research and the development of synths, which they use to shape society according to a more enlightened, collectivist ideal.

Newfound Empowerment: Their creed is to empower society by merging technology and science to create a utopian environment, with synths functioning as tools for societal reconstruction.

Mutants Have a Role: Contrasting with the Enclave, the Institute views genetically engineered or mutated beings as valid members of society, actively working towards their coexistence.

Now that we understand both factions’ core tenets, we can attempt to answer our question.

Answer:

No, the Enclave would not likely appreciate or be interested in the Institute. Here are some key differences that justify this stance:

• Authoritarian Control vs. Utopian Collectivism: Enclave’s goal is martial governance, while the Institute desires a technologically enabled collective society.
• Erasure vs. Acceptance of Mutants: Enclave views mutants as enemies, while the Institute attempts to incorporate them.
• Military Power Armor vs. Synth-Human Coexistence: The Enclave emphasizes power armor for control and domination, while the Institute focuses on blurring lines between human and synth through genetic engineering.
• Fear vs. Empathy: The Enclave spreads fear of change and perceived threats, while the Institute fosters coexistence and understanding.
  • This fundamental shift away from an authoritarian society (Enclave) toward an enlightened collective (Institute) implies that both would be opposed to one another’s worldviews, should their visions not have irreparably changed.

Table illustrating the contrasts between Enclave and Institute:

When comparing these two opposing entities, we can draw no conclusion indicating a strong chance of collaboration or affection. Instead, their irreconcilable differences underscore that they are natural rivals with competing worldviews and societal blueprints.

Please Note: In the game lore, these factions don’t interact or have interactions shown in any official materials.

This conclusion is built on the foundations of understanding Enclave and Institute as represented in Fallout lore and cannot be used to suggest in-game relationships or possibilities for future interactions.